PEER REVISION
PEER REVISION
Details of Paddocks rampage
emerged, police recover the 64 year old killers cell phone looking for motive
for this mass shooting. They find he has no criminal record but has bought 33 weapons
since October of 2016. Most were rifles . he monitored feet traffic in the
hallway of the hotel where he thought if he would reside to after the shooting.
He shot at a crowd of 22,000 people, killing 58and injured. Stephen fired
rounds at security guards in the hallway before shooting himself. The rest of
the article seems irrelevant to me because the title is “Las Vegas Killer
Stephen Paddock Was Planning To Escape After The shooting” the authors of this
article goes into talking about Paddocks gun purchases and why there wasn’t a
red flag at the store he purchased from. I don’t see how this relates to the
topic.
Kayla starts her blog off by
introducing her article, authors and source. She then goes into summarizing the
article she chose. She quoted the article a few times without using quotations.
She gives her thoughts on the article which I agree with but the article didn’t
seem very subjective, it was more facts and information than the authors
thoughts and opinions. Kayla said herself “they put a lot of information and
facts on Stephen Paddock”. I’m thinking Kayla might not have understood the
directions. She gives her subjective opinion instead of her chosen article
having a subjective opinion. I could be wrong but other than that and a few punctuation
errors, I got the gist of where Kayla was coming from and what she is saying. Overall
it was a very good blog response.
I agree with you I should put more into this article but I will do better in my other articles.Thank you for the tips.
ReplyDeleteyour welcome and you still did very well
Delete